the JOBS for Success Act

Text of Legislation

• BILLS-1155861ih.pdf

Amendments

• Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 5861
• The Amendment offered by Ms. Chu to remove the 50% limit on Federal TANF spending for child care was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 22 nays to 14 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The amendment offered by Dr. Davis to develop a Federal Interagency Working Group was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 nays to 14 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The amendment offered by Ms. Sewell to add certain state performance indicators was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 22 nays to 15 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The amendment offered by Mr. Doggett to increase the reservation of Federal Funds for certain purposes was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 nays to 11 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The amendment offered by Mr. Neal to invest more money in workforce development for parents.
• The amendment offered by Mr. Levin to increase the corporate tax rate.
• The amendment offered by Ms. Sanchez that would increase funding for CCES
• The amendment offered by Dr. Davis that would improve protections for vulnerable families.
• The amendment offered by Dr. Davis that would promote child well-being
• The amendment offered by Dr. Davis that would expand funding for Health Marriage Promotion and Responsible Fatherhood grants.

Documents

• WAM Description of the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 5861

Votes

• H.R. 5861 was ordered favorably reported to the House of Representatives as amended by a roll call vote of 22 yeas to 14 nays (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on Mr. Reichert’s motion to table Mr. Neal’s appeal of the ruling of the Chair was agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 yeas to 14 nays (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on the amendment offered by Mr. Doggett to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5861, which increase the reservation of Federal Funds for certain purposes was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 nays to 11 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on Mr. Reichert’s motion to table Ms. Sanchez’s appeal of the ruling of the Chair was agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 yeas to 13 nays (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on the amendment offered by Mr. Davis to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5861, which would develop a Federal Interagency Working Group was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 21 nays to 14 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on the amendment offered by Ms. Sewell to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5861, which would add certain state performance indicators was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 22 nays to 15 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on the amendment offered by Ms. Chu to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5861, which would remove the 50% limit on Federal TANF funds that can be transferred for child care was not agreed to by a roll call vote of 22 nays to 14 yeas (with a quorum being present).
• The vote on Mr. Roskam’s motion to table Mr. Davis’s appeal of the ruling of the Chair was agreed to by a roll call vote of 22 yeas to 14 nays (with a quorum being present).